• America’s Future Stood for the Rule of Law
    Immigration Enforcement and the Limits of Judicial Power
    by Michael T. Flynn LTG USA (RET)
    https://genflynn.substack.com/p/americas-future-stood-for-the-rule
    America’s Future Stood for the Rule of Law Immigration Enforcement and the Limits of Judicial Power by Michael T. Flynn LTG USA (RET) https://genflynn.substack.com/p/americas-future-stood-for-the-rule
    GENFLYNN.SUBSTACK.COM
    America’s Future Stood for the Rule of Law
    Immigration Enforcement and the Limits of Judicial Power
    0 Comments 0 Shares 11 Views 0 Reviews
  • MARK CARNEY JUST ADMITTED CANADA HAS A PROBLEM!
    Danielle Smith pushed for another route to world markets. Ottawa eventually agreed. Now the Prime Minister says Canada needs it because we are too dependent on the United States.
    by The Iron Quill
    https://thequillstrikes.substack.com/p/mark-carney-just-admitted-canada
    MARK CARNEY JUST ADMITTED CANADA HAS A PROBLEM! Danielle Smith pushed for another route to world markets. Ottawa eventually agreed. Now the Prime Minister says Canada needs it because we are too dependent on the United States. by The Iron Quill https://thequillstrikes.substack.com/p/mark-carney-just-admitted-canada
    THEQUILLSTRIKES.SUBSTACK.COM
    MARK CARNEY JUST ADMITTED CANADA HAS A PROBLEM
    Danielle Smith pushed for another route to world markets. Ottawa eventually agreed. Now the Prime Minister says Canada needs it because we are too dependent on the United States.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 30 Views 0 Reviews
  • An Antisemitic Plague In Canada!
    Hatred, Conspiracy Theory, and Derangement
    by James Pew
    https://wokewatchcanada.substack.com/p/an-antisemitic-plague-in-canada
    An Antisemitic Plague In Canada! Hatred, Conspiracy Theory, and Derangement by James Pew https://wokewatchcanada.substack.com/p/an-antisemitic-plague-in-canada
    WOKEWATCHCANADA.SUBSTACK.COM
    An Antisemitic Plague In Canada
    Hatred, Conspiracy Theory, and Derangement
    0 Comments 0 Shares 21 Views 0 Reviews
  • New Records Just Blew A Hole In Jack Smith’s Story About The Mar-a-Lago Case
    https://wltreport.com/2026/09/29/new-records-just-blew-a-hole-in-jack-smiths-story-about-the-mar-a-lago-case
    New Records Just Blew A Hole In Jack Smith’s Story About The Mar-a-Lago Case https://wltreport.com/2026/09/29/new-records-just-blew-a-hole-in-jack-smiths-story-about-the-mar-a-lago-case
    WLTREPORT.COM
    New Records Just Blew A Hole In Jack Smith’s Story About The Mar-a-Lago Case
    Newly released NARA records say the message behind the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation was not a criminal referral, contradicting Jack Smith’s court filing.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 13 Views 0 Reviews
  • Liberals admit ‘assault-style firearm’ has no legal definition as RCMP says it doesn’t track crimes involving them!
    Asked directly for the government's definition of an assault-style firearm, Public Safety Canada responded: “There is no legal definition of an assault-style firearm.”
    by Sheila Gunn Reid
    https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_admit_assault_style_firearm_has_no_legal_definition_as_rcmp_says_it_doesnt_track_crimes_involving_them
    Liberals admit ‘assault-style firearm’ has no legal definition as RCMP says it doesn’t track crimes involving them! Asked directly for the government's definition of an assault-style firearm, Public Safety Canada responded: “There is no legal definition of an assault-style firearm.” by Sheila Gunn Reid https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_admit_assault_style_firearm_has_no_legal_definition_as_rcmp_says_it_doesnt_track_crimes_involving_them
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Liberals admit ‘assault-style firearm’ has no legal definition as RCMP says it doesn’t track crimes involving them
    Asked directly for the government's definition of an assault-style firearm, Public Safety Canada responded: “There is no legal definition of an assault-style firearm.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares 94 Views 0 Reviews
  • Here's the breakdown in plain terms:


    ## Who's fighting whom


    Yemen has been split in two since 2014:


    - **The Houthis** (also called "Ansar Allah") — a Zaydi Shia rebel group from northern Yemen. They seized the capital Sanaa in 2014 and control most of the north and west. They just captured the Red Sea coastline, including the critical **Bab al-Mandeb Strait** (the chokepoint between the Red Sea and Indian Ocean, through which a huge share of global shipping passes).


    - **The Yemeni Government** (the "Presidential Leadership Council" or PLC), led by **Rashad al-Alimi** — the internationally recognized government, based in the south. The "general mobilization" is *him* calling on Yemenis to join his forces to fight the Houthis. He's offering amnesty to Houthi fighters who defect.


    ## Who's paying and backing each side


    | Side | Backed by | What they get |
    |------|-----------|---------------|
    | **Houthis** | **Iran** (primary), plus reported support from Russia and China | Weapons, ballistic missiles, drone technology, military training (via Hezbollah and the IRGC), **free oil shipments**, funding through exchange networks in Yemen, Turkey, and the Caribbean |
    | **Yemeni Government (PLC)** | **Saudi Arabia** (primary), plus the US and UK | Military funding, air support, intelligence, political recognition at the UN |


    So this is fundamentally an **Iran vs. Saudi Arabia proxy war**, with the US/UK on the Saudi side. The Houthis also attack Israeli and Western shipping, which ties them to the broader US-Iran conflict that started in February 2026.


    ## Where the Houthis came from


    They emerged in the 1990s in Yemen's northern Saada province, from Yemen's **Zaydi Shia minority** (a different branch of Shia Islam than Iran's Twelver Shia, but Iran still backs them ideologically). They fought six wars against Yemen's government starting in 2004, then seized Sanaa in 2014 when the government was weakened by a popular uprising.


    ## Why @BRICSNews posted it


    This is the tricky part. **BRICS** is a bloc of 11+ countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, etc.) that positions itself as an alternative to the Western-led order. But on Yemen, **BRICS is split down the middle**:


    - **Iran, Russia, China** → support the Houthis
    - **Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt** → oppose the Houthis


    At the BRICS summit in New Delhi in September 2026 (held at the *exact moment* the Houthis were seizing the Red Sea coast), the final declaration **deliberately omitted any mention of Yemen, the Houthis, or the Red Sea**. The only thing they agreed on was a vague call for "maximum restraint."


    So when @BRICSNews posts this, it's not a unified "BRICS position" — it's likely a member state (probably Iran or Russia) using the BRICS account to frame the story in their favour: that the Yemeni government is the aggressor and the Houthis are the legitimate defenders. It's **propaganda framing**, not a consensus statement.


    ## In one sentence for a Canadian


    A Saudi-backed government in southern Yemen is calling up its citizens to fight an Iran-backed rebel group that just seized the country's Red Sea coast — and a media account associated with a bloc of countries that contains *both* sides of the conflict is posting it as if it's a unified position.
    Here's the breakdown in plain terms: ## Who's fighting whom Yemen has been split in two since 2014: - **The Houthis** (also called "Ansar Allah") — a Zaydi Shia rebel group from northern Yemen. They seized the capital Sanaa in 2014 and control most of the north and west. They just captured the Red Sea coastline, including the critical **Bab al-Mandeb Strait** (the chokepoint between the Red Sea and Indian Ocean, through which a huge share of global shipping passes). - **The Yemeni Government** (the "Presidential Leadership Council" or PLC), led by **Rashad al-Alimi** — the internationally recognized government, based in the south. The "general mobilization" is *him* calling on Yemenis to join his forces to fight the Houthis. He's offering amnesty to Houthi fighters who defect. ## Who's paying and backing each side | Side | Backed by | What they get | |------|-----------|---------------| | **Houthis** | **Iran** (primary), plus reported support from Russia and China | Weapons, ballistic missiles, drone technology, military training (via Hezbollah and the IRGC), **free oil shipments**, funding through exchange networks in Yemen, Turkey, and the Caribbean | | **Yemeni Government (PLC)** | **Saudi Arabia** (primary), plus the US and UK | Military funding, air support, intelligence, political recognition at the UN | So this is fundamentally an **Iran vs. Saudi Arabia proxy war**, with the US/UK on the Saudi side. The Houthis also attack Israeli and Western shipping, which ties them to the broader US-Iran conflict that started in February 2026. ## Where the Houthis came from They emerged in the 1990s in Yemen's northern Saada province, from Yemen's **Zaydi Shia minority** (a different branch of Shia Islam than Iran's Twelver Shia, but Iran still backs them ideologically). They fought six wars against Yemen's government starting in 2004, then seized Sanaa in 2014 when the government was weakened by a popular uprising. ## Why @BRICSNews posted it This is the tricky part. **BRICS** is a bloc of 11+ countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, etc.) that positions itself as an alternative to the Western-led order. But on Yemen, **BRICS is split down the middle**: - **Iran, Russia, China** → support the Houthis - **Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt** → oppose the Houthis At the BRICS summit in New Delhi in September 2026 (held at the *exact moment* the Houthis were seizing the Red Sea coast), the final declaration **deliberately omitted any mention of Yemen, the Houthis, or the Red Sea**. The only thing they agreed on was a vague call for "maximum restraint." So when @BRICSNews posts this, it's not a unified "BRICS position" — it's likely a member state (probably Iran or Russia) using the BRICS account to frame the story in their favour: that the Yemeni government is the aggressor and the Houthis are the legitimate defenders. It's **propaganda framing**, not a consensus statement. ## In one sentence for a Canadian A Saudi-backed government in southern Yemen is calling up its citizens to fight an Iran-backed rebel group that just seized the country's Red Sea coast — and a media account associated with a bloc of countries that contains *both* sides of the conflict is posting it as if it's a unified position.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 209 Views 0 Reviews
  • Socialist Sister of Michigan Senate Nominee Abdul El-Sayed Caught on Hidden Camera Admitting He’s “Not a F***ing Capitalist” — “All We Care About Is Getting Him In”
    by Jim Hᴏft
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/socialist-sister-michigan-senate-nominee-abdul-el-sayed
    Socialist Sister of Michigan Senate Nominee Abdul El-Sayed Caught on Hidden Camera Admitting He’s “Not a F***ing Capitalist” — “All We Care About Is Getting Him In” by Jim Hᴏft https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/socialist-sister-michigan-senate-nominee-abdul-el-sayed
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Socialist Sister of Michigan Senate Nominee Abdul El-Sayed Caught on Hidden Camera Admitting He’s “Not a F***ing Capitalist” — “All We Care About Is Getting Him In”
    Far-left Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed has spent months telling voters he is “not a socialist” and “just a capitalist who understands how capi…
    0 Comments 0 Shares 27 Views 0 Reviews
  • Back in 2018, an article appeared on the Ashtree Wildcrafting website addressing the controversy around ingesting chokecherry fruit. Digging to the bottom of that controversy revealed the concept of preparation. However, visitors to our booth have begun surfacing a third way to enjoy this fruit - the practice of pouring salt into a bag, dropping berries in to coat them in salt, then eating them raw.


    The Amygdalin rabbit-trail revealed other things too,however, the scientific community has no idea what dosage is safe and what is unsafe, though some admit that getting it from food is more advantagous and most likely safer than getting it as a supplement. My Nutritional/Medicinal database now has 34 common foods listed. 12 of them are noted to have the compound in the kernel or seed, the highest concentration in the domestic world being that of the bitter almond followed by the apricot kernel.


    If your diet is high in sulfur-rich and B12 rich foods, which means your cabbage, broccoli, onions, garlic, beef, eggs, etc, then salted raw chockecherries may be ok. If you avoid bioavailable sources of B12, or don't like or can't have sulfur-rich foods, cooking your chockecherries is preferable before ingesting them.


    https://naturalhealthgodsway.ca/2026/09/24/eating-raw-chokecherries-with-salt-can-i-get-some-scientific-proof-here/
    Back in 2018, an article appeared on the Ashtree Wildcrafting website addressing the controversy around ingesting chokecherry fruit. Digging to the bottom of that controversy revealed the concept of preparation. However, visitors to our booth have begun surfacing a third way to enjoy this fruit - the practice of pouring salt into a bag, dropping berries in to coat them in salt, then eating them raw. The Amygdalin rabbit-trail revealed other things too,however, the scientific community has no idea what dosage is safe and what is unsafe, though some admit that getting it from food is more advantagous and most likely safer than getting it as a supplement. My Nutritional/Medicinal database now has 34 common foods listed. 12 of them are noted to have the compound in the kernel or seed, the highest concentration in the domestic world being that of the bitter almond followed by the apricot kernel. If your diet is high in sulfur-rich and B12 rich foods, which means your cabbage, broccoli, onions, garlic, beef, eggs, etc, then salted raw chockecherries may be ok. If you avoid bioavailable sources of B12, or don't like or can't have sulfur-rich foods, cooking your chockecherries is preferable before ingesting them. https://naturalhealthgodsway.ca/2026/09/24/eating-raw-chokecherries-with-salt-can-i-get-some-scientific-proof-here/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 196 Views 0 Reviews
  • Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge!
    On another Trump impeachment vote, 47 House Democrats, including the entire leadership, voted "present" — refusing to rule out impeachment if they retake the majority.
    By Sarah Katherine Sisk
    https://amac.us/newsline/democrats-admit-their-no-1-priority-is-political-revenge-not-affordability
    Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge! On another Trump impeachment vote, 47 House Democrats, including the entire leadership, voted "present" — refusing to rule out impeachment if they retake the majority. By Sarah Katherine Sisk https://amac.us/newsline/democrats-admit-their-no-1-priority-is-political-revenge-not-affordability
    AMAC.US
    Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge
    While Democrats campaign on "affordability," their impeachment vote reveals a different priority. See how Dems signaled their real agenda—and what it could mean if they win.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 108 Views 0 Reviews
  • The Brake That Only AI Giants Can Afford!
    Why Alberta should read Anthropic’s AI rules as a permit process, not a fire alarm
    by Joseph Fournier, Ph.D.
    https://josephfournier.substack.com/p/the-brake-that-only-ai-giants-can
    The Brake That Only AI Giants Can Afford! Why Alberta should read Anthropic’s AI rules as a permit process, not a fire alarm by Joseph Fournier, Ph.D. https://josephfournier.substack.com/p/the-brake-that-only-ai-giants-can
    JOSEPHFOURNIER.SUBSTACK.COM
    The Brake That Only AI Giants Can Afford
    Why Alberta should read Anthropic’s AI rules as a permit process, not a fire alarm
    0 Comments 0 Shares 109 Views 0 Reviews
More Results
Sponsored
FriendVu https://friendvu.com