• Media Ignores Democrats’ Massive ActBlue Scandal!
    A new House report says ActBlue had shockingly low standards for investigating possible foreign donations to U.S. political campaigns - but the media is trying to bury the scandal.
    By Sarah Katherine Sisk
    https://amac.us/newsline/media-ignores-democrats-massive-actblue-scandal
    Media Ignores Democrats’ Massive ActBlue Scandal! A new House report says ActBlue had shockingly low standards for investigating possible foreign donations to U.S. political campaigns - but the media is trying to bury the scandal. By Sarah Katherine Sisk https://amac.us/newsline/media-ignores-democrats-massive-actblue-scandal
    AMAC.US
    ActBlue Scandal Deepens as Media Stays Silent Before Elections
    House Republicans allege serious fraud on ActBlue, the top Democrat fundraising platform. Yet the media has gone silent. Here's what investigators uncovered—and why it matters.
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 82 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Authorities Warn Against "Speculation" After Five British Nationals Arrested Near UK Airbase On Suspicion Of Terrorism
    by Tyler Durden
    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-stealth-bomber-base-uk-delta-alert-nearby-counter-terror-police-make-arrests-deploy
    Authorities Warn Against "Speculation" After Five British Nationals Arrested Near UK Airbase On Suspicion Of Terrorism by Tyler Durden https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-stealth-bomber-base-uk-delta-alert-nearby-counter-terror-police-make-arrests-deploy
    WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM
    British Police Release All Five RAF Fairford Terror Suspects On Bail
    The decision to release all five suspects on bail is very questionable given the seriousness...
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 91 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Bill Gates Predicts A Billion Deaths Via Evolutionary Event
    by Tyler Durden
    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/bill-gates-predicts-billion-deaths-evolutionary-event
    Bill Gates Predicts A Billion Deaths Via Evolutionary Event by Tyler Durden https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/bill-gates-predicts-billion-deaths-evolutionary-event
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 54 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Here's the breakdown in plain terms:


    ## Who's fighting whom


    Yemen has been split in two since 2014:


    - **The Houthis** (also called "Ansar Allah") — a Zaydi Shia rebel group from northern Yemen. They seized the capital Sanaa in 2014 and control most of the north and west. They just captured the Red Sea coastline, including the critical **Bab al-Mandeb Strait** (the chokepoint between the Red Sea and Indian Ocean, through which a huge share of global shipping passes).


    - **The Yemeni Government** (the "Presidential Leadership Council" or PLC), led by **Rashad al-Alimi** — the internationally recognized government, based in the south. The "general mobilization" is *him* calling on Yemenis to join his forces to fight the Houthis. He's offering amnesty to Houthi fighters who defect.


    ## Who's paying and backing each side


    | Side | Backed by | What they get |
    |------|-----------|---------------|
    | **Houthis** | **Iran** (primary), plus reported support from Russia and China | Weapons, ballistic missiles, drone technology, military training (via Hezbollah and the IRGC), **free oil shipments**, funding through exchange networks in Yemen, Turkey, and the Caribbean |
    | **Yemeni Government (PLC)** | **Saudi Arabia** (primary), plus the US and UK | Military funding, air support, intelligence, political recognition at the UN |


    So this is fundamentally an **Iran vs. Saudi Arabia proxy war**, with the US/UK on the Saudi side. The Houthis also attack Israeli and Western shipping, which ties them to the broader US-Iran conflict that started in February 2026.


    ## Where the Houthis came from


    They emerged in the 1990s in Yemen's northern Saada province, from Yemen's **Zaydi Shia minority** (a different branch of Shia Islam than Iran's Twelver Shia, but Iran still backs them ideologically). They fought six wars against Yemen's government starting in 2004, then seized Sanaa in 2014 when the government was weakened by a popular uprising.


    ## Why @BRICSNews posted it


    This is the tricky part. **BRICS** is a bloc of 11+ countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, etc.) that positions itself as an alternative to the Western-led order. But on Yemen, **BRICS is split down the middle**:


    - **Iran, Russia, China** → support the Houthis
    - **Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt** → oppose the Houthis


    At the BRICS summit in New Delhi in September 2026 (held at the *exact moment* the Houthis were seizing the Red Sea coast), the final declaration **deliberately omitted any mention of Yemen, the Houthis, or the Red Sea**. The only thing they agreed on was a vague call for "maximum restraint."


    So when @BRICSNews posts this, it's not a unified "BRICS position" — it's likely a member state (probably Iran or Russia) using the BRICS account to frame the story in their favour: that the Yemeni government is the aggressor and the Houthis are the legitimate defenders. It's **propaganda framing**, not a consensus statement.


    ## In one sentence for a Canadian


    A Saudi-backed government in southern Yemen is calling up its citizens to fight an Iran-backed rebel group that just seized the country's Red Sea coast — and a media account associated with a bloc of countries that contains *both* sides of the conflict is posting it as if it's a unified position.
    Here's the breakdown in plain terms: ## Who's fighting whom Yemen has been split in two since 2014: - **The Houthis** (also called "Ansar Allah") — a Zaydi Shia rebel group from northern Yemen. They seized the capital Sanaa in 2014 and control most of the north and west. They just captured the Red Sea coastline, including the critical **Bab al-Mandeb Strait** (the chokepoint between the Red Sea and Indian Ocean, through which a huge share of global shipping passes). - **The Yemeni Government** (the "Presidential Leadership Council" or PLC), led by **Rashad al-Alimi** — the internationally recognized government, based in the south. The "general mobilization" is *him* calling on Yemenis to join his forces to fight the Houthis. He's offering amnesty to Houthi fighters who defect. ## Who's paying and backing each side | Side | Backed by | What they get | |------|-----------|---------------| | **Houthis** | **Iran** (primary), plus reported support from Russia and China | Weapons, ballistic missiles, drone technology, military training (via Hezbollah and the IRGC), **free oil shipments**, funding through exchange networks in Yemen, Turkey, and the Caribbean | | **Yemeni Government (PLC)** | **Saudi Arabia** (primary), plus the US and UK | Military funding, air support, intelligence, political recognition at the UN | So this is fundamentally an **Iran vs. Saudi Arabia proxy war**, with the US/UK on the Saudi side. The Houthis also attack Israeli and Western shipping, which ties them to the broader US-Iran conflict that started in February 2026. ## Where the Houthis came from They emerged in the 1990s in Yemen's northern Saada province, from Yemen's **Zaydi Shia minority** (a different branch of Shia Islam than Iran's Twelver Shia, but Iran still backs them ideologically). They fought six wars against Yemen's government starting in 2004, then seized Sanaa in 2014 when the government was weakened by a popular uprising. ## Why @BRICSNews posted it This is the tricky part. **BRICS** is a bloc of 11+ countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, etc.) that positions itself as an alternative to the Western-led order. But on Yemen, **BRICS is split down the middle**: - **Iran, Russia, China** → support the Houthis - **Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt** → oppose the Houthis At the BRICS summit in New Delhi in September 2026 (held at the *exact moment* the Houthis were seizing the Red Sea coast), the final declaration **deliberately omitted any mention of Yemen, the Houthis, or the Red Sea**. The only thing they agreed on was a vague call for "maximum restraint." So when @BRICSNews posts this, it's not a unified "BRICS position" — it's likely a member state (probably Iran or Russia) using the BRICS account to frame the story in their favour: that the Yemeni government is the aggressor and the Houthis are the legitimate defenders. It's **propaganda framing**, not a consensus statement. ## In one sentence for a Canadian A Saudi-backed government in southern Yemen is calling up its citizens to fight an Iran-backed rebel group that just seized the country's Red Sea coast — and a media account associated with a bloc of countries that contains *both* sides of the conflict is posting it as if it's a unified position.
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 222 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Conflict Runs in the Family!
    Diana Fox Carney and Mark Carney - Conflicts of Interest, the “Green” Transition - From Finance to Political Appointments
    https://hardpressednorth.substack.com/p/conflict-runs-in-the-family
    Conflict Runs in the Family! Diana Fox Carney and Mark Carney - Conflicts of Interest, the “Green” Transition - From Finance to Political Appointments https://hardpressednorth.substack.com/p/conflict-runs-in-the-family
    HARDPRESSEDNORTH.SUBSTACK.COM
    Conflict Runs in the Family
    Diana Fox Carney and Mark Carney - Conflicts of Interest, the “Green” Transition - From Finance to Political Appointments
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 69 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Can We Be Honest About BC’s Election?
    Aaron Pete on David Eby’s election call, political accountability, and the answers British Columbians deserve
    by Aaron Pete
    https://aaronpete.substack.com/p/can-we-be-honest-about-bcs-election
    Can We Be Honest About BC’s Election? Aaron Pete on David Eby’s election call, political accountability, and the answers British Columbians deserve by Aaron Pete https://aaronpete.substack.com/p/can-we-be-honest-about-bcs-election
    AARONPETE.SUBSTACK.COM
    Can We Be Honest About BC’s Election?
    Aaron Pete on David Eby’s election call, political accountability, and the answers British Columbians deserve
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 26 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Watch: Retiring Judge Judy Finally Goes Totally Political and It's the Most Glorious 2 MAGA Minutes of Her Career
    By Brooklynn Robinson
    https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-retiring-judge-judy-finally-goes-totally-political-glorious-2-maga-minutes-career
    Watch: Retiring Judge Judy Finally Goes Totally Political and It's the Most Glorious 2 MAGA Minutes of Her Career By Brooklynn Robinson https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-retiring-judge-judy-finally-goes-totally-political-glorious-2-maga-minutes-career
    WWW.WESTERNJOURNAL.COM
    Watch: Judge Judy Says Don’t Come to My Country and Try to Change It, as Retiring Star Sounds Full-on MAGA
    Judge Judy just left the bench and stopped talking like a syndication contract was listening. Judith Sheindlin, 83, told USA Today she is stepping back from on-camera court after 30 years. […]
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 74 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge!
    On another Trump impeachment vote, 47 House Democrats, including the entire leadership, voted "present" — refusing to rule out impeachment if they retake the majority.
    By Sarah Katherine Sisk
    https://amac.us/newsline/democrats-admit-their-no-1-priority-is-political-revenge-not-affordability
    Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge! On another Trump impeachment vote, 47 House Democrats, including the entire leadership, voted "present" — refusing to rule out impeachment if they retake the majority. By Sarah Katherine Sisk https://amac.us/newsline/democrats-admit-their-no-1-priority-is-political-revenge-not-affordability
    AMAC.US
    Democrats Admit Their No. 1 Priority Is Political Revenge
    While Democrats campaign on "affordability," their impeachment vote reveals a different priority. See how Dems signaled their real agenda—and what it could mean if they win.
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 121 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • PLANET CANADA: THE CURIOUS DECLINE OF COMMON SENSE
    A Wildlife Documentary Exploring the Strange Evolution of Modern Progressive Liberalism in the Canadian Political Ecosystem
    by Melanie In Saskatchewan
    https://melanieinsaskatchewan.substack.com/p/planet-canada-the-curious-decline
    PLANET CANADA: THE CURIOUS DECLINE OF COMMON SENSE A Wildlife Documentary Exploring the Strange Evolution of Modern Progressive Liberalism in the Canadian Political Ecosystem by Melanie In Saskatchewan https://melanieinsaskatchewan.substack.com/p/planet-canada-the-curious-decline
    MELANIEINSASKATCHEWAN.SUBSTACK.COM
    PLANET CANADA: THE CURIOUS DECLINE OF COMMON SENSE
    A Wildlife Documentary Exploring the Strange Evolution of Modern Progressive Liberalism in the Canadian Political Ecosystem
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 320 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
  • Liberals 'blew up' trade deal with U.S. for political reasons!
    Sheila Gunn Reid and Tamara Ugolini react to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's assertion that Canadian officials walked away from trade talks at the last minute for political, not economic reasons.
    https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_blew_up_trade_deal_with_us_for_political_reasons
    Liberals 'blew up' trade deal with U.S. for political reasons! Sheila Gunn Reid and Tamara Ugolini react to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's assertion that Canadian officials walked away from trade talks at the last minute for political, not economic reasons. https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_blew_up_trade_deal_with_us_for_political_reasons
    WWW.REBELNEWS.COM
    Liberals 'blew up' trade deal with U.S. for political reasons
    Sheila Gunn Reid and Tamara Ugolini react to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's assertion that Canadian officials walked away from trade talks at the last minute for political, not economic reasons.
    0 Reacties 0 Delingen 384 Weergaven 0 Beoordelingen
Meer-resultaten
Sponsor
FriendVu https://friendvu.com